The Problem of Digital Trade Regulation: Silences Regarding Labour and Their Potential Disruption by a Sustainability Agenda

Authors

• Tonia Novitz, University of Bristol, UK

Author ORCID Identifier

0000-0003-1623-5106 (Tonia Novitz)

Abstract

The growing impact of digital trade on work in global supply chains is readily detectable but there are curious regulatory silences on labour-related issues. The key problem identified in digital trade law is national obstruction to the free flow of data needed to promote online ordering and delivery of goods and services. In comparison, the concerns of those whose work is constitutive of digital trade, such as platform workers, are largely overlooked. Arguably, provisions often found in trade agreements relating to digital privacy and the effects of algorithmic management could be utilised by those at work. However, there remain uncertainties regarding their scope and therefore their effect on labour markets. Meanwhile, other labour-related issues concerning migration have not even entered the digital trade governance discourse. The case for addressing these silences is presented here, alongside exploration of the potential for a sustainability agenda to disrupt and reshape this representation of the digital trade problem. In this respect, reference to “digital inclusion” in trade agreements indicates that no one should be left behind, including those in the world of work. Sustainability objectives can also be linked to digital product passports, traceability initiatives which could address breaches of fundamental international labour standards associated with production and disposal of digital hardware in the circular economy. However, it is much too early to say that we have witnessed a genuine revolution in the dominant perception of what it is appropriate to regulate in the sphere of digital trade. Labour remains marginalised.

Recommended Citation

Novitz, Tonia (2026) "The Problem of Digital Trade Regulation: Silences Regarding Labour and Their Potential Disruption by a Sustainability Agenda," Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal: Vol. 46: Iss. 2, Article 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2819-2567.1136
Available at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cllpj/vol46/iss2/4

References

Adams-Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a service: The promise and perils of work in the gig economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198797012.001.0001

Adams-Prassl, J., Aloisi, A., Countouris, N., De Stefano, V., & Rainone, S. (2025). Protecting platform workers in the European Union. European Labour Law Journal, 16(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525251376935

Aloisi, A. (2025). Integrating the EU twin (green and digital) transition? Synergies, tensions and pathways for the future of work. European Commission Joint Research Centre. https:// publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC140964

Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2022). Your boss is an algorithm: Artificial intelligence, platform work and labour. Hart Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509953219

Aloisi, A., & Gramano, E. (2019). Artificial intelligence is watching you at work: Digital surveillance, employee monitoring, and regulatory issues in the EU context. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 41(1), 95–122.

Amnesty International. (2017). Time to recharge: Corporate action and inaction to tackle abuses in the cobalt supply chain. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/afr62/7395/2017/en/

Andrenelli, A., & Lopez-Gonzalez, J. (2023). Understanding the potential scope, definition and impact of the WTO e-commerce moratorium. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/59ceace9-en

Andrijasevic, R., & Novitz, T. (2020). Supply chains and unfree labor: Regulatory failure in the case of Samsung Electronics in Slovakia. Journal of Human Trafficking, 6(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1691817

Andrijasevic, R., & Sacchetto, D. (2017). “Disappearing workers”: Foxconn in Europe and the changing role of temporary work agencies. Work, Employment and Society, 31(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015622918

Aneesh, A. (2006). Virtual migration: The programming of globalization. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387534

Anwar, M. A. (2022). Platforms of inequality: Gender dynamics of digital labour in Africa. Gender and Development, 30(3), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2121059

Atkinson, J., & Collins, P. (2024). Algorithmic management and a new generation of rights at work. Institute of Employment Rights. https://www.ier.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/IER_ AmWorkRgts_PREVIEW.pdf

Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217887

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson Education.

Bacchi, C. (2020). Problem-solving as a governing knowledge: “Skills”-testing in PISA and PIAAC. Open Journal of Political Science, 10(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2020.101007

Bacchi C. & Goodwin, S. (2025). Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice, 2nd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/978-1-349-96134-4

Bacchus, J. (2023). The future of the WTO multilateral or plurilateral? Cato Institute. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep49726

Bahri, A., & Boklan, D. (2022). Not just sea turtles, let’s protect women too: Invoking public morality exception or negotiating a new gender exception in trade agreements? The European Journal of International Law, 33(1), 237–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac003

Ball, K. (2022). Surveillance in the workplace: Past, present, and future. Surveillance and Society, 20(4), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v20i4.15805

Blackett, A. (2015). Social regionalism in Better Work Haiti. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 31(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2015010

Blackett, A. (2020). On social regionalism in transnational labour law. International Labour Review, 159(4), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12185

Bohnert, S. (2025). The shift to unilateralism in the European Union’s trade policy: An exercise in taxonomy. Common Market Law Review, 62(4), 1057–1088. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2025066

Boklan, D., Starshinova, O., & Bahri, A. (2023). Joint statement initiatives: A legitimate end to “until everything is agreed”? Journal of World Trade, 57(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2023014

Borelli, S., Loffredo, A., Marzo, C., & Walser, M. (2025). Sorry we subcontracted you. European Trade Union Institute. https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2025-06/Sorry%20we%20subcontracted%20you_2025.pdf

Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001

Bradford, A. (2023). Digital Empires: The global battle to regulate technology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197649268.001.0001

Burri, M. (2022). A WTO agreement on electronic commerce: An inquiry into its legal substance and viability. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 53(4), 565–625.

Burri, M. (2023). The impact of digitalization on global trade law. German Law Journal, 24(3), 551–573. https://doi:10.1017/glj.2023.29

Burri, M., & Chander, A. (2023). What are digital trade and digital trade law? American Journal of International Law: Unbound, 117, 99–103. https://doi:10.1017/aju.2023.14

Calvão, F., Mcdonald, C. E. A., & Bolay, M. (2021). Cobalt mining and the corporate outsourcing of responsibility in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(4), 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.02.004

Curtis, K., & Echeverría Manrique, E. (2021). Trade arrangements and labour standards in a supply chain world: Current issues and future considerations. In G. Delautre, E. Echeverría Manrique, & C. Fenwick (Eds.), Decent work in a globalized economy: Lessons from public and private initiatives (pp. 109–133). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/ sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40dcomm/%40publ/documents/ publication/wcms_771481.pdf

Deberdt, R., & Le Billon, P. (2022). The green transition in context — Cobalt responsible sourcing for battery manufacturing. Society and Natural Resources, 35(7), 784–803. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2022.2049410

De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy” (Conditions of work and employment series No. 71). International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/ public/%40ed_protect/%40protrav/%40travail/documents/publication/wcms_443267.pdf

Ekman, A. O., & Engblom, S. (2019). Expanding the movement of natural persons through free trade agreements? A review of CETA, TPP and ChAFTA. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 35(2), 163–200. https://doi. org/10.54648/ijcl2019009

El Makhloufi, A. (2023). AI application in transport and logistics: Opportunities and challenges (an exploratory study). CoE City Net Zero, Faculty of Technology, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. https://research.hva.nl/en/publications/ai-application-in-transport-and-logistics-opportunities-and-chall/

Fares, N., Islam, M. S., Jauhar, S. K., & Kucukaltan, B. (2025). Towards an international digital product passport: the new paradigm of a worldwide circular economy. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5(6), 5475-5495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00690-5

Forsyth, A., & McCrystal, S. (2025). Collective bargaining and collective action in the platform economy: A 2024 update of developments in legislation, case law and collective agreements (ILO Working Paper No. 143). International Labour Organization. https://doi. org/10.54394/EMDS2473

Fudge, J. (2012). Precarious migrant status and precarious employment: The paradox of international rights for migrant workers. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 34(1), 95–132.

Gomes, A., Verma, A., & Guimares, D. (2023). Life with rights: Inclusive labour law and decent work for wastepickers in Brazil. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 39(3–4), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2023024

Harindranath, G., & Unwin, T. (2024). Digital technologies, migration and the sustainable development goals agenda. In N. Piper & K. Datta (Eds.), The Elgar companion to migration and the sustainable development goals (pp. 151–164). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi. org/10.4337/9781802204513.00019

Harrington, C. (2021). United Nations policy on sexual exploitation and abuse: Problematizations and performances. Critical Social Policy, 42(3), 469–489. https://doi. org/10.1177/02610183211047928

Harrison, J. (2019). The labour rights agenda in free trade agreements. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 20(5), 705–725. https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/20/5/article-p705_5.xml

Hine, A., Gibson, C., & Mayes, R. (2023). Critical minerals: Rethinking extractivism? Australian Geographer, 54(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2023.2210733

Huws, U. (n.d.). The rise of platform labour: A fair “sharing economy” or virtual wild west? Protecting employment rights in an increasingly digital labour market. University of Hertfordshire. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/bulletin-pr/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/08162835/UniofHerts_Research-briefing_Rise-of-platform-labour.pdf

International Labour Organization. (2019). Time to act for SDG 8: Integrating decent work, sustained growth and environmental integrity. https://www.ilo.org/publications/time-act-sdg-8-integrating-decent-work-sustained-growth-and-environmental-0

International Labour Organization. (2021). World employment and social outlook: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. https://www.ilo.org/publications/flagship-reports/role-digital-labour-platforms-transforming-world-work

International Labour Organization. (2025). Policy brief prepared for the Second World Summit for Social Development: Bridging the digital divide. https://www.ilo.org/publications/bridging-digital-divide

International Trade Centre. (2025). Global Digital Trade Development Report 2025. https://www.intracen.org/resources/publications/global-digital-trade-development-report-2025

Ismail, Y. (2020). E-commerce in the World Trade Organization: History and latest developments in the negotiations under the joint statement. International Institute for Sustainable Development and Consumer Unity & Trust Society International. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/e-commerce-world-trade-organization-.pdf

Jones, E., Beatriz, K., & Tavengerwei, R. (2024). Norm entrepreneurship in digital trade: The Singapore-led wave of digital trade agreements. World Trade Review, 23(2), 208–241. https://doi:10.1017/S1474745624000089

Kalantzakos, S. (2019). The geopolitics of critical minerals. Istituto Affari Internazionali. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep23660

Kaufmann, C. (2021). Responsible business in a digital world – What’s international law got to do with it? Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht/Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 81(3), 781–815. https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2021-3-781

Kelsey, J., Bush, J., Montes, M., & Ndubai, J. (2020). How “Digital Trade” rules would impede taxation of the digitalised economy in the Global South. Third World Network. https://twn.my/title2/latestwto/general/News/Digital%20Tax.pdf

Kim, J. (2025). The allure of trade and sustainable development chapters. Michigan Journal of International Law, 46(2), 337–361. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol46/iss2/5

Krummel, D., & Siegfried, P. (2021). The dark side of Samsung’s value chain: The human costs of cobalt mining “Blood, Sweat and Cobalt.” Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 9(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2021.92011

Leonelli, G. C. (2023). Environmental unilateralism and the chapeau of Article XX GATT: The “line of equilibrium” and the question of “differently situated” countries. Journal of World Trade, 57(5), 709–730. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2023030

Loganathan, M. (2021). Assessing social sustainability in the gig economy. Centre for Open Science. https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/5gych.html

López González, J., & Jouanjean, M. (2017). Digital trade: Developing a framework for analysis. OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 205, OECD Publishing. Digital Trade (EN). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2017/07/digital-trade_7ae979cb/524c8c83-en.pdf

López López, J. (Ed.) (2025). Remote work and labor institutions. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009597029

Maes, S. (2024). Here to stay, but in what form? Researching the potential of cross-border telework in the digital economy. Europeum: Institute for European Policy. https://www.europeum.org/ en/articles-and-publications/policy-paper-here-to-stay-but-in-what-form-researching-the-potential-of-cross-border-telework-in-the-digital-economy/

Maitre-Ekern, E., Taylor, M. B., & van der Velden, M. (2020). Towards a sustainable circular economy: SMART Reform Proposals [Working paper]. University of Oslo. https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3596076

Meltzer, J. P. (2019). Governing digital trade. World Trade Review, 18(S1), S23–S48. https:// doi:10.1017/S1474745618000502

Mieriņa, I., & Šūpule, I. (2024). Rise of remote work across borders: Opportunities and implications for migrant-sending countries. Frontiers in Sociology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fsoc.2024.1290629

Mitchell, A. D., & Chin, E. (2023). The WTO joint statement initiative on e-commerce: Navigating digital trade rules in a fragmented world. Journal of World Trade, 57(6), 971–992. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2023041

Mitchell, A. D., & Mishra, N. (2020). Digital trade integration in preferential trade agreements. Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade. https://repository.unescap.org/server/ api/core/bitstreams/75fd31e7-7449-4baa-8de8-88251e0b0d81/content

Moon, G. (2018). A “fundamental moral imperative”: Social inclusion, the sustainable development goals and international trade law after Brazil-Taxation. Journal of World Trade, 52(6), 995–1017. https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2018043

Nguyen, T. M. (2025-2026). Goods’ nationalities. Southern California Law Review, 99, Advance online publication. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5184400

Novitz, T. (2014). Evolutionary trajectories for transnational labour law: Trade in goods to trade in services? Current Legal Problems, 67(1), 239–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuu005

Novitz, T. (2024). Trade, labour and sustainable development: Leaving no one in the world of work behind. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786430533

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). Committee on Statistics and Statistical Policy — Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Services Statistics. OECD-WTO Handbook on Measuring Digital Trade 27–29 March 2019. OECD Headquarters. https://one.oecd.org/document/SDD/CSSP/WPTGS(2019)4/en/pdf

Orth, B. (2025). Forging mobilities, becoming ideal workers? Temporary migration and the gig economy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51(11), 2793–2811. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2025.2467176

Pécoud, A. (2021). Philosophies of migration governance in a globalizing world. Globalizations, 18(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1774316

Pham, B.-C., & Davies, S. R. (2025). What problems is the AI Act solving? Technological solutionism, fundamental rights, and trustworthiness in European AI policy. Critical Policy Studies, 19(2), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2373786

Pieraccini, M., & Novitz, T. (2020). Sustainability and law: A historical and theoretical overview. In M. Pieraccini & T. Novitz (Eds.), Legal perspectives on sustainability (pp. 9–38). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529201017.002

Posada, J. (2024). Deeply embedded wages: Navigating digital payments in data work. Big Data & Society, 11(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241242446

Posadas, D. V., Jr. (2017). After the gold rush: The boom of the internet of things, and the busts of data-security and privacy. Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 28(1), 69–108. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol28/iss1/2/

Rodrigues Gonçalves, M., Nogueira Cruvinel, V. R., Verpaele, S., Bashash, M., Pintas Marques, C., Urbano, M. R., Bastos Paoliello, M. M., Aschner, M., & da Silva Santos, V. (2024). Metal levels in waste pickers in Brasilia, Brazil: Hair and nail as exposure matrices. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 87(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2023.2276372

Rombouts, S. J. (2017). The evolution of indigenous peoples’ consultation rights under the ILO and U.N. regimes. Stanford Journal of International Law, 53(2), 169–224. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/the-evolution-of-indigenous-peoples-consultation-rights-under-the-ilo-and-u-n-regimes/

Sovacool, B. K. (2021). When subterranean slavery supports sustainability transitions? Power, patriarchy, and child labor in artisanal Congolese cobalt mining. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(1), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.11.018

Stahel, W. R. (2019). The circular economy: A user’s guide. Routledge.

Tham, J.-C. (2020). Equality and community for migrant workers. In A. Bogg, J. Rowbottom, & A. L. Young (Eds.), The constitution of social democracy: Essays in honour of Keith Ewing (pp. 375–396). Bloomsbury Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509916603.ch-020

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2025). The digital economy: A new frontier for trade, investment and sustainable growth. United Nations Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/press-material/facts-figures-digital-economy

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2025). White paper on digital product passports and critical raw materials for batteries: Legal conflicts and principles for cross-border co-operation. https://unece.org/trade/documents/2025/09/white-paper-digital-product-passports-and-critical-raw-materials-batteries

van der Merwe, A., & Brugger, F. (2021). Case study: The digital device life cycle: From mining to e-waste. In Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Development Co-Operation Report 2021: Shaping a just digital transformation (pp. 204-210). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/31d11f68-en

van der Velden, M., & Taylor, M. B. (2017). Smart deliverable: Sustainability hotspots analysis of the mobile phone lifecycle (Interim Report of Findings in Work Package 4, Sustainable Market Actors for Responsible Trade). University of Oslo. https://www.smart.uio.no/publications/ reports/sustainability-hotspots-analysis-of-the-mobile-phone-lifecycle.pdf

Vidigal, G., & Claussen, K. (2024). The sustainability revolution in international trade agreements. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191994470.001.0001

Willemyns, I. (2021). Digital services in international trade law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108946353

Wolfe, R. (2019). Learning about digital trade: Privacy and e-commerce in CETA and TPP. World Trade Review, 18(S1), S63–S84. https://doi:10.1017/S1474745618000435

Wood, A. (2024). Algorithmic management: From technology to politics and theory. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 4(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/4.3.9

World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, & United Nations. (2023). Handbook on measuring digital trade (2nd Edition). WTO Print. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/digital_ trade_2023_e.pdf