Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Abstract
Labour law is a fragmented regulatory landscape bringing together multiple legal sources drawn from various areas of law, institutions, and interactions between multiple regulatory tiers and frameworks. This article offers a conceptual and analytical framework for understanding the intricate contemporary structure of labour law and its effectiveness in ensuring the protections it has historically been intended to provide. The article considers four types of legal fragmentation — temporal, vertical, horizontal, and institutional — distinguished by character and effect. The fragmented architecture of legal regulation leads, unsurprisingly, to complexity. The article puts forward an analytical approach that assesses how labour law’s complexity and fragmentation impacts its effectiveness. The article first explains the process of mapping a fragmented regulatory landscape and outlines the analytical benchmarks for assessing legal effectiveness. The concluding section examines labour law as a fragmented landscape and the resulting normative dynamics.
Recommended Citation
Gesualdi-Fecteau, Dalia; Johnstone, Richard; and Richard, Geneviève
(2025)
"The Fragmentation and Complexity of Labour Law, Effective Protections, and Better Work: An Analytical Framework,"
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal: Vol. 45:
Iss.
1, Article 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2819-2567.1021
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cllpj/vol45/iss1/4
References
Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216688272
Abdelnour, S., Julliard, É., & Méda, D. (2023). Promoting employed worker status on digital platforms: How France’s labour inspection and social security agencies address “uberisation.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 29(3), 339–354. https://doi. org/10.1177/10242589231190566
Adams, Z., & Wenckebach, J. (2023). Collective regulation of algorithmic management. European Labour Law Journal, 14(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167477
Adams-Prassl, J., Abraha, H., Kelly-Lyth, A., Silberman, M., & Rakshita, S. (2023). Regulating algorithmic management: A blueprint. European Labour Law Journal, 14(2), 124–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525231167299
Almond, P., & Esbester, M. (2016). The changing legitimacy of health and safety, 1960–2015: Understanding the past, preparing for the future. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 14(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2016.1231868
Aloisi, A., & De Stefano, V. (2022). Your boss is an algorithm: Artificial intelligence, platform work and labour. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509953219
Amengual, M., & Fine, J. (2017). Co-enforcing labor standards: The unique contributions of state and worker organizations in Argentina and the United States. Regulation & Governance, 11(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12122
Arthurs, H. (2013). Labor law as the law of economic subordination and resistance: A thought experiment. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 34(3), 585–604. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1757&contex t=scholarly_works. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2056624
Benyekhlef, K. (2015). Une possible histoire de la norme : Les normativités émergentes de la mondialisation (2e éd.) [A possible history of the norm: Emerging normativities of globalisation (2nd ed.)]. Thémis.
Benzerafa-Alilat, M., & Gibert, P. (2022). De l’inflation normative à l’amplification des lois dans le processus parlementaire : Pistes pour une analyse avancée des facteurs inflationnistes [From normative inflation to the amplification of laws in the parliamentary process: Avenues for an advanced analysis of inflationary factors]. Revue française d’administration publique, 182(2), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.182.0196
Besnier, L., Forte, M., Garat, T., Liakopoulou, M.-E., Moizard, N., & Tournadre, F. (2019). Négocier la déconnexion : Analyse des accords déconnexion dans la région Grand Est [Negotiating disconnection: Analysis of disconnection agreements in the Grand East region]. Institut du Travail, Université de Strasbourg. https://www.dialogue-social.fr/articles-par-themes/article/negocierla- deconnexion-analyse-des-accords-deconnexion-dans-la-region-grand-est
Black, J. (2003). Enrolling actors in regulatory systems: Examples from UK financial services regulation. Public Law, Spring, 63–91.
Black, S. J. (2005). Community unionism: A strategy for organizing in the new economy. New Labor Forum, 14(3), 24–32.
Bluff, E., & Johnstone, R. (2021). COVID-19 and the regulation of work health and safety. Australian Journal of Labour Law, 34(1), 112–129.
Brubaker, R. (2023). Hyperconnectivity and its discontents. Polity Press.
Bujold, A., Roberge-Maltais, I., Parent-Rocheleau, X., Boasen, J., Sénécal, S., & Léger, P.- M. (2024). Responsible artificial intelligence in human resources management: A review of the empirical literature. AI & Ethics, 4, 1185–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s43681-023-00325-1
Buzbee, William W., The Regulatory Fragmentation Continuum, Westway, and the Challenges of Regional Growth. Journal of Law and Politics, Vol. 21, 2005, Emory Public Law Research Paper No. 05-31, Emory Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-23, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=842145.
Camacho, A. E., & Glicksman, R. L. (2019). Reorganizing government: A functional and dimensional framework. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479829675.001.0001
Colangelo, A. J. (2016). A systems theory of fragmentation and harmonization. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 49(1), 1–61.
Collins, H., Ewing, K. D., & McColgan, A. (2019). Labour law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108617758
Côté, D., Durant, S., MacEachen, E., Majowicz, S., Meyer, S., Huynh, A.-T., Laberge, M., & Dubé, J. (2021). A rapid scoping review of COVID-19 and vulnerable workers: Intersecting occupational and public health issues. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 64(7), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23256
Cox, R., & Lippel, K. (2020). Legal frameworks for preventing work-related bullying and harassment and ensuring access to remedies for targets. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (3rd ed., pp. 649–674). CRC Press. https://doi. org/10.1201/9780429462528-25
Davidov, G. (2021). Compliance with and enforcement of labour laws: An overview and some timely challenges. Soziales Recht, 11(3), 111–127.
Davidov, G., & Langille, B. (Eds.). (2011). The idea of labour law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693610.001.0001
Demers, V. (1996). Le contrôle des fumeurs : Une étude d’effectivité du droit [Regulating smokers: A study of legal effectiveness]. Thémis.
Doellgast, V., Wagner, I., & O’Brady, S. (2023). Negotiating limits on algorithmic management in digitalised services: Cases from Germany and Norway. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 29(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221143044
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226212708.001.0001
Fine, J. (1997). Community unionism: The key to the new labor movement. Perspectives on Work, 1(2), 32–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23271912
Fine, J., & Piore, M. (2021). Introduction to a special issue on the new labor federalism. ILR Review, 74(5), 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939211032934
Fine, J., & Round, J. (2024). Governing for worker power: Worker centers lead the way on labor law enforcement. New Labor Forum, 33(1), 44–53. https://doi. org/10.1177/10957960231220910
Fudge, J., & MacPhail, F. (2009). The Temporary Foreign Worker Program in Canada: Lowskilled workers as an extreme form of flexible labor. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 31(1), 101–139.
Galanter, M. (1983). The radiating effect of courts. In K. O. Boyum & L. M. Mather (Eds.), Empirical theories about courts (pp. 117–142). Longman.
Gesualdi-Fecteau, D. (2015). Le droit comme rempart utile? L’usage par les travailleurs étrangers temporaires des ressources proposées par le droit du travail [Law as a useful bulwark? The use by temporary foreign workers of the resources offered by labour law]. Revue générale de droit, 45(2), 531–578. https://doi.org/10.7202/1035300ar
Gesualdi-Fecteau, D., Visotzky-Charlebois, M., Clouet, J., Leclerc, C., & Morin-Aubut, A. (2024). Le recours aux modes alternatifs de règlement des conflits : Une exploration au prisme d’une analyse des coûts humains et financiers de la justice [The use of alternative dispute resolution methods: An exploration through the lens of the human and financial cost analysis of justice]. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue canadienne de droit et société, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2024.1
Golden, L., & Dickson, A. (2020). Precarious times at work: Detrimental hours and scheduling in Illinois and how fair workweek policies will improve workers’ well-being. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795584
Gray, G., & Silbey, S. S. (2011). The other side of the compliance relationship. In C. Parker & V. L. Nielsen (Eds.), Explaining compliance: Business responses to regulation (pp. 123–138). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857938732.00012
Hastie, B. (2017). The inaccessibility of justice for migrant workers: A capabilities-based perspective. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 34(2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5019
Heger Boyle, E. (2000). Is law the rule? Using political frames to explain cross-national variation in legal activity. Social Forces, 79(2), 385–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/79.2.385
Helbo Jespersen, A., Hasle, P., & Nielsen, K. T. (2016). The wicked character of psychosocial risks: Implications for regulation. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6(3), 23–42. https://doi. org/10.19154/njwls.v6i3.5526
Hendrickx, F. (2019). Regulating working conditions through EU directives — EU employment law outlook and challenges (Publication No. 638430) [Policy Brief ]. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies, European Union. https://www.europarl. europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/638430/IPOL_BRI(2019)638430_EN.pdf
Henly, J. R., Lambert, S. J., & Dresser, L. (2021). The new realities of working-class jobs: Employer practices, worker protections, and employee voice to improve job quality. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 695(1), 208–224. https://doi. org/10.1177/00027162211028130
Houwerzijl, M. (2022). Enforcement of EU labour law in a transnational context. In Z. Rasnaca, A. Koukiadaki, N. Bruun, & K. Lörcher (Eds.), Effective enforcement of EU labour law (pp. 165–190). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509944446.ch-008
International Labour Office. (2021). Violence and Harassment in the World of Work A Guide on Convention No. 190 and Recommendation No. 206. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40dgreports/%40gender/ documents/publication/wcms_814507.pdf
Jacobs, A. (2022). The enforcement structure for EU labour law. In Z. Rasnaca, A. Koukiadaki, N. Bruun, & K. Lörcher (Eds.), Effective enforcement of EU labour law (pp. 13–34). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509944446.ch-001
Johnson, O. C. A. (2021). The future of labor localism in an age of preemption. ILR Review, 74(5), 1179–1201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920970932
Johnstone, R., & Stewart, A. (2015). Swimming against the tide: Australian labor regulation and the fissured workplace. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(1), 55–90.
Kountouris, N. (2018). The concept of “worker” in European labour law: Fragmentation, autonomy, and scope. Industrial Law Journal, 47(2), 192–225. https://doi. org/10.1093/indlaw/dwx014
Kwon, C., & Raman, A. (2023). The real effects of fair workweek laws on work schedules: Evidence from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.4609755
Legault, M.-J., & Bellemare, G. (2009). De nouveaux acteurs de la régulation du travail dans la gestion par projets [New actors in labour regulation within project-based management]. Interventions économiques, 39. https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.214
Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing regulation: Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. Bloomsbury Academic Mackaay, E. (2018). L’inflation normative [Normative inflation]. Lex Electronica, 23, 35–52.
Marsden, S. (2019). Migrant workers, rights, and the rule of law: Responding to the justice gap. Dalhousie Law Journal, 42(1), 153–182.
Murray, G., Gesualdi-Fecteau, D., Lévesque, C., & Roby, N. (2023). What makes work better or worse? An analytical framework. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 29(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231207967
Murray, G., Lévesque, C., Morgan, G., & Roby, N. (2020). Disruption and re-regulation in work and employment: From organisational to institutional experimentation. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 26(2), 135–156. https://doi. org/10.1177/1024258920919346
Nakache, D. (2013). The Canadian Temporary Foreign Worker Program: Regulations, practices, and protection gaps. In L. Goldring & P. Landolt (Eds.), Producing and negotiating noncitizenship (pp. 71–96). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442663862-008
Noreau, P. (2002). Comment la législation est-elle possible(? Objectivation et subjectivation du lien social [How is legislation possible? Objectivation and subjectivation of the social bond]. McGill Law Journal, 47(1), 195–236.
Ollier-Malaterre, A., Jacobs, J. A., & Rothbard, N. P. (2019). Technology, work, and family: Digital cultural capital and boundary management. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 425–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022433
Peetz, D. (2021). Institutional experimentation, directed devolution, and the search for policy innovation. Relations industrielles / Industrial relations, 76(1), 69–89. https://doi. org/10.7202/1075574ar
Pellerin, S., Ollier-Malaterre, A., Ernst Kossek, E., Afota, M.-C., Cousineau, L., Lavoie, C.-É., Leon, E., Beham, B., Morandin, G., Russo, M., Jaga, A., Ma, J., Lu, C.-Q., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022). The right to disconnect. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.48558/PSA0-TE13
Piore, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2018). Root-cause regulation: Protecting work and workers in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674986244
Rangeon, F. (1989). Réflexions sur l’effectivité du droit [Reflections on the effectiveness of law]. In Centre universitaire de recherches sur l’action publique et le politique, épistémologie et sciences sociales [University Research Centre on Public Policy, Politics, Epistemology, and the Social Sciences] (Eds.), Les usages sociaux du droit [The social uses of law] (pp. 126–149). Presses Universitaires de France.
Rasnaca, Z. (2022). Enforcing migrant and mobile workers’ rights. In Z. Rasnaca, A. Koukiadaki, N. Bruun, & K. Lörcher (Eds.), Effective enforcement of EU labour law (pp. 265–290). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509944446.ch-012
Rice, R. E., & Leonardi, P. M. (2014). Information and communication technologies in organizations. In L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 425–448). SAGE Publications.
Rifkin, J. (1995). The end of work: The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the postmarket era. G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Rocher, G. (1996). Les phénomènes d’internormativité : Faits et obstacles [Internormativity: facts and obstacles]. In J. G. Belley (Ed.), Le droit soluble: Contributions québécoises à l’étude de l’internormativité [Soluble law: Quebec contributions to the study of internormativity] (p. 25-42). Droit et Société, 16. Paris: L.G.D.J.
Rosen, J. (2001). A labor perspective of workplace violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00293-2
Schuck, P. H. (1992). Legal complexity: Some causes, consequences, and cures. Duke Law Journal, 42(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372753
Stephens, K. K. (2018). Negotiating control: Organizations and mobile communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190625504.001.0001
Sulmane, D. (2011). “Legislative inflation” — An analysis of the phenomenon in contemporary legal discourse. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 4(2), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.2478/ v10076-011-0013-4
Supiot, A. (1984). Délégalisation, normalisation et droit du travail [Delegalisation, standardisation, and labour law]. Droit social, 5(1), 296-307. Trémeau, C. (2017). S’informer, s’indigner, réclamer, revendiquer ou non en entreprise : Les jeunes salariés à l’épreuve de leurs droits [Being informed, outraged, demanding, or not in the workplace: Young employees facing their rights] (Doctoral dissertation, Nantes University). https://archive.bu.univ-nantes.fr/pollux/show.action?id=88ad9634-dd80-4c25-b094-ef2371f7995a
Tufts, S. (1998). Community unionism in Canada and labor’s (re)organization of space. Antipode, 30(2), 227–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00076
Unterschütz, J. (2022). Enforcing EU labour law by means of administrative law. In Z. Rasnaca, A. Koukiadaki, N. Bruun, & K. Lörcher (Eds.), Effective enforcement of EU labour law (pp. 81–100). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509944446.ch-004
Van Aerden, K., Vanroelen, C., & Gevaert, J. (2023). The impact of new technologies on the quality of work. In M. Wahrendorf, T. Chandola, & A. Descatha (Eds.), Handbook of life course occupational health (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-94023-2_26-1
Velázquez, M. (2017). Comparative study of the psychosocial risks prevention enforcement by the European labour inspectorates. In L. Lerouge (Ed.), Psychosocial risks in labour and social security law: A comparative legal overview from Europe, North America, Australia and Japan (pp. 31–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63065-6_3
Velázquez, M., & Jain, A. (2021). The role of work environment authorities in the dynamics of workplace bullying, emotional abuse, and harassment. In P. D’Cruz, E. Noronha, E. Baillien, B. Catley, K. Harlos, A. Høgh, & E. G. Mikkelsen (Eds.), Pathways of job-related negative behaviour (pp. 525–553). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0935-9_19
Von Bergen, C. W., & Bressler, M. S. (2019). Work, non-work boundaries, and the right to disconnect. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 21(2), 51–69. https://articlegateway. com/index.php/JABE/article/view/1454/1384
Walters, D., Johnstone, R., Frick, K., Quinlan, M., Baril-Gingras, G., & Thébaud-Mony, A. (2011). Regulating workplace risks: A comparative study of inspection regimes in times of change. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931658
Weissbrodt, R., Arial, M., Graf, M., Iff, S., & Giauque, D. (2018). Preventing psychosocial risks at work: An evaluation study of labour inspectorate interventions. Safety Science, 110(Part A), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.024
Weissbrodt, R., & Giauque, D. (2017). Labour inspections and the prevention of psychosocial risks at work: A realist synthesis. Safety Science, 100(Part A), 110–124. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.012
Wright, C. F., Groutsis, D., & van den Broek, D. (2017). Employer-sponsored temporary labour migration schemes in Australia, Canada and Sweden: Enhancing efficiency, compromising fairness? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1854–1872. https://doi.org/10.108 0/1369183X.2016.1251834