Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal
Abstract
Paid domestic work is governed simultaneously by several normative frameworks that have different sources. Traditionally, it has been regulated by what Adelle Blackett defines as the “law of the household workplace,” as well as by state law. Thus, the tension between these two normative frameworks makes effective access to rights uncertain for domestic workers, even those with formal labour contracts. In addition, when digital platforms intervene, their rules also apply. From a sociological perspective, and using the categories forged by historical institutionalism to study dynamics of institutional change, this article aims to understand how different normative systems — formal and informal — come into tension when regulating paid domestic work. It does so by focusing on the formalisation of the labour relationship. The question confronted here is not why formalisation occurs (or, more often, why it does not), but rather when it occurs (or when employers and domestic workers expect it to occur). This question appears to be linked to the particular uses and interpretations of three key issues: the trial period established by labour law, the time required to build a relationship of trust according with the “law of the household workplace,” and the “satisfaction guarantee” established by the digital platform. I argue that the overlap between these three competing, albeit co-existing, normative frameworks creates a space of regulatory ambiguity that allows domestic workers, employers, and the digital platform to reinterpret the legal norms and tailor enforcement mechanisms to their own interests.
Recommended Citation
Poblete, Lorena
(2025)
"When Digital Platforms Intrude Into the Regulation of Paid Domestic Work: The Case of Formalisation in Argentina,"
Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal: Vol. 45:
Iss.
1, Article 10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/2819-2567.1027
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cllpj/vol45/iss1/10
References
Azari, J. R., & Smith, J. K. (2012). Unwritten rules: Informal institutions in established democracies. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592711004890
Barbic, A., & Miklavcic-Brezigar, I. (1999). Domestic work abroad: A necessity and an opportunity for rural women from the Goriska Borderland Region of Slovenia. In J. H. Momsen (Ed.), Gender, migration and domestic service (pp. 161–174). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452509_chapter_10
Bickham Mendez, J. (1998). Of mops and maids: Contradictions and continuities in bureaucratized domestic work. Social Problems, 45(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1998.45.1.03x0160d
Blackett, A. (2011). Introduction: Regulating decent work for domestic workers. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.23.1.001
Blackett, A. (2019). Everyday transgressions: Domestic workers’ transnational challenge to international labor law. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501715778
Brites, J. (2014). Domestic service, affection and inequality: Elements of subalternity. Women’s Studies International Forum, 46, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.03.009
Buzbee, W. W. (2005). The regulatory fragmentation continuum, Westway, and the challenges of regional growth. Journal of Law and Politics, 21(2 & 3), 323–364.
Cámara de Diputados de la Nación. (2011, March 16). Diario de sesiones (Período 129º: 1ª reunión — 1ª sesión ordinaria. Marzo 16 de 2011) [Journal of sessions (Period 129: 1st meeting — 1st regular session. March 16, 2011)]. https://www.hcdn.gob.ar/sesiones/sesion.html?id=850&numVid=0&reunion=1&periodo=129
Cámara de Senadores de la Nación. (2011, May 4). Diario de sesiones (Período 129º: 5ª reunión — 4ª sesión ordinaria. Mayo 4 de 2011) [Journal of sessions (Period 129: 5th meeting — 4th regular session. May 4, 2011)]. https://www.senado.gob.ar/parlamentario/sesiones/busquedaTac
Dewey, M. (2012). Illegal police protection and the market for stolen vehicles in Buenos Aires. Journal of Latin American Studies, 44(4), 679–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X12000831
Dewey, M. (2018). Zona liberada: La suspensión de la ley como patrón de comportamiento estatal [Liberated zone: The suspension of the law as a pattern of state behaviour]. Nueva Sociedad, 276, 102–117. https://nuso.org/articulo/zona-liberada/
Engle Merry, S. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38
Gorbán, D. (2013). El trabajo doméstico se sienta a la mesa: La comida en la configuración de las relaciones entre empleadores y empleadas en la ciudad de Buenos Aires [Domestic work sits at the table: Food in the configuration of relations between employers and employees in the city of Buenos Aires]. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 1(45), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.7440/res45.2013.06
Gorbán, D., & Tizziani, A. (2014). Inferiorization and deference: The construction of social hierarchies in the context of paid domestic labor. Women’s Studies International Forum, 46, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.01.001
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/abs/informal-institutions-and-comparative-politics-a-researchagenda/11A6AA9DCAF579F5B72DA250728AA513
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2006). Informal institutions and democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801883514
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Hondagneau-Sotelo, P. (2001). Doméstica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affuence. University of California Press.
King-Dejardin, A. (2016). Formalizing domestic work. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/ publication/wcms_536998.pdf
Kuznesof, E. (1989). A history of domestic service in Spanish America, 1492–1980. In E. M. Chaney & M. Garcia Castro (Eds.), Muchachas no more: Household workers in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 17–36). Temple University Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610447713
Mackay, F., Kenny, M., & Chappell, L. (2010). New institutionalism through a gender lens: Towards a feminist institutionalism? International Political Science Review, 31(5), 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110388788
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2015). Advances in comparative-historical analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316273104
Ohaco, M. (2023). Registración del servicio doméstico: Evaluación de impacto de una política de difusión dirigida a empleadores [Registration of domestic service: Impact assessment of a dissemination policy aimed at employers]. Económica, 69(32), 86–121. https://doi.org/10.24215/18521649e032
Page, E. C. (2003). The civil servant as legislator: Law making in British administration. Public Administration, 81(4), 651–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00366.x
Palier, B. (2005). Ambiguous agreement, cumulative change: French social policy in the 1990s. In W. Streek & K. Thalen (Eds.), Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 127–144). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199280452.003.0005
Pereyra, F. (2013). El acceso desigual a los derechos laborales en el servicio doméstico Argentino: una aproximación desde la óptica de las empleadoras [Unequal access to labour rights in Argentine domestic service: An approach from the perspective of employers]. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 1(45), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.7440/res45.2013.05
Pereyra, F. (2017). Trabajadoras domésticas y protección social en Argentina: Avances y desafíos pendientes (Documento de trabajo no. 15) [Domestic workers and social protection in Argentina: Progress and challenges (Working paper no. 15)]. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/es/publications/trabajadoras-domesticas-y-proteccionsocial-en-argentina-avances-y-desafios
Pereyra, F., & Poblete, L. (2024). The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina. International Labour Review, 163(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12435
Pereyra, F., Poblete, L., & Tizziani, A. (2023). Plataformas digitales de servicio doméstico y condiciones laborales: El caso de Argentina [Digital domestic service platforms and working conditions: The case of Argentina]. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/es/publications/plataformas-digitales-de-servicio-domestico-y-condiciones-laborales-el-caso
Poblete, L. (2018a). The ILO domestic workers convention and regulatory reforms in Argentina, Chile and Paraguay: A comparative study of working time and remuneration regulations. International Labour Review, 157(3), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12115
Poblete, L. (2018b). The influence of the ILO domestic workers convention in Argentina, Chile and Paraguay. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 34(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2018008
Poblete, L. (2019). The different meanings of formalisation. Experiments from the south: The case of Argentina. In D. Ashiagbor (Ed.), Re-imagining labour law for development: Informal work in the global North and South (pp. 167–190). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509913138.ch-007
Poblete, L. (2020). For the recognition of domestic workers’ rights: The controversies associated with regulatory reforms in Argentina, Chile and Paraguay. In A. Hammer & A. Fishwick (Eds.), The political economy of work in the global South: Reflections on labour process theory (pp. 220–240). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350493797.ch-011
Poblete, L. (2021). Decent work for domestic workers in Argentina: Institutional innovations within the same framework. Journal of Labor and Society, 24(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-20212007
Poblete, L., Pereyra, F., & Tizziani, A. (2024a). La intermediación digital en el trabajo doméstico remunerado en América Latina: Una propuesta analítica para su estudio [Digital intermediation in paid domestic work in Latin America: An analytical proposal for study]. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 89, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.7440/res89.2024.01
Poblete, L., Tizziani, A., & Pereyra, F. (2024b). Plataformas digitales y formalización laboral: El trabajo doméstico remunerado en Argentina durante la pandemia [Digital platforms and labor formalisation: Paid domestic work in Argentina during the pandemic]. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 32(63), 1–29.
Poblete, L., Pereyra, F., & Tizziani, A. (2024c). Digital intermediation in paid domestic work in Argentina: An analysis of ambivalent effects on working conditions. Critical Sociology, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241289952
Radcliffe, S. A. (1999). Race and domestic services: Migration and identity in Ecuador. In J. H. Momsen (Ed.), Gender, migration and domestic service (pp. 81–94). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203452509_chapter_5
Rohde, D. W. (1988). Studying congressional norms: Concepts and evidence. Congress & the Presidency, 15(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07343468809507942
Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Temple University Press.
Romero, M. (1988). Chicanas modernize domestic service. Qualitative Sociology, 11(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988969
Romero, M. (1992). Maid in the USA (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315539751
Schoenbaum, N. (2016). Gender and the sharing economy. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 43(4), 1023–1070. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol43/iss4/4
Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.008
Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00746.x
Thelen, K., & Conran, J. (2016). Institutional change. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti, & A. Sheingate (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical institutionalism (pp. 51–70). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.3
Tizziani, A., & Poblete, L. (2022). La intervención de plataformas digitales en el trabajo doméstico remunerado en Argentina [The intervention of digital platforms in paid domestic work in Argentina]. Sociedade e Cultura, 25. https://revistas.ufg.br/fcs/article/view/71033/38852. https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v25.71033
Valenzuela, M. E., & Mora, C. (Eds.). (2009). Trabajo doméstico: Un largo camino hacia el trabajo decente [Domestic work: A long road to decent work]. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@americas/@ro-lima/@srosantiago/documents/publication/wcms_180549.pdf
Waylen, G. (2014). Informal institutions, institutional change, and gender equality. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360
Zolvers. (n.d.). Términos y condiciones [Terms and conditions]. https://zolvers-ayuda.notion.site/Trminos-y-Condiciones-e9e3c32ae95e487088514a1e98d6c430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913510360.
