Author ORCID Identifier
Suzanne Chiodo: 0000-0002-9837-3942
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-20-2025
Source Publication
Western Journal of Legal Studies, 2025, 16:1 (online first): page 19-38. DOI: 10.5206/uwojls.v16i1.22166
Keywords
Proportionality; Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil Justice Reform; Administration of Civil Justice
Abstract
Proportionality was introduced into Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure in 2008. A plain reading of Rules 1.04(1) and (1.1) is the ‘traditional’ interpretation of proportionality: that proportionality is merely the means of furthering efficiency and economy in individual cases, with the aim of better securing substantive justice on the merits in those cases. The relative measure is what is at stake in the individual case. This article suggests a counter-cultural interpretation: that proportionality is equal in importance to substantive justice and that, in certain circumstances, substantive justice in individual cases must give way to proportionality, in order to secure the just distribution of resources for all cases. The relative measure is what is at stake for the civil justice system as a whole, with justice defined more collectively. This article posits that proportionality can effect a change in our legal culture, but only if we accept a countercultural definition of that word.
Repository Citation
Chiodo, Suzanne, "Taking Proportionality Seriously: A Countercultural Approach" (2025). Articles & Book Chapters. 3308.
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/3308
Comments
"The Western Journal of Legal Studies publishes articles under an open access policy. Under these principles the author retains copyright in the article while granting the WJLS a limited time exclusive right to submit the article to commercial research services. The author in turn is required to cite WJLS as first publisher if s/he republishes or reprints elsewhere. Please see the UWOJLS Publication Agreement for details.
The WJLS encourages authors to deposit post-print articles in institutional repositories or other open access repositories.
For more information on open access principles, see Open Access Law Program.
Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. Its contents do not reflect the opinion of the University Students’ Council of the University of Western Ontario (“USC”). The USC assumes no responsibility or liability for any error, inaccuracy, omission or comment contained in this publication or for any use that may be made of such information by the reader."