Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Publication Date

2025

Abstract

The question of improper use of tax treaties (or treaty shopping) defies a simple or straightforward answer. The line between “proper use” and “improper use” a tax treaty depends on the determination of the intended use of a treaty provision by Contracting States (i.e. the common intention as well as the object and purpose of the treaty provision). As a treaty interpretation issue, that determination varies from country to country. Furthermore, the extent of taxpayers’ right to tax planning and expectation of tax certainty also varies across countries. Finally, the effect of domestic general-anti-avoidance rules (GAARs) and the new principal purpose test (PPT) in treaty shopping cases remains unclear. Drawing on 43 reports from IFA branches and the European Union, landmark court decisions and scholarly debates, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of how source states deal with treaty shopping and offers some predictions about the impact of the PPT as a “global minimum standard” in addressing treaty shopping.

Comments

"International Fiscal Association, 2025 Lisbon Congress"

Download

Request a copy that is accessible using assistive technology (link opens in a new window)

Share

COinS