Intellectual Property Journal. Volume 23 (2011), p. 147-157.
burden of consent; burden of consent in copyright infringement; consent and infringement of copyright; consent as defence; copyright infringement; intellectual property consent; intellectual property in Hong Kong
A Canadian federal court recently claimed in a copyright infringement case that consent is a matter of defence for defendants to prove. This paper takes issue with that assertion. Lack of consent is an ingredient of infringement and the legal burden must therefore be on the plaintiff to plead and prove it, although the secondary burden of leading evidence, especially where implied consent is alleged, may shift back and forth during a trial. The Note examines case law from the UK, Hong Kong and Australia concludes that similar principles apply to all intellectual property infringement cases.
Vaver, David. "Consent or No Consent: The Burden of Proof in Intellectual Property Infringement Suits." Intellectual Property Journal 23 (2011): 147-157.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.