Date of Award
9-19-2024
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Laws (LLM)
Keywords
Law and social movements, Movement lawyering, Social change, Social justice, Social change lawyering, Lawyering models, Qualitative interviews, Law and emotion, Legal ethics, Ethical conflicts, Emotional conflicts, Exploratory study, Scoping study, Feminist legal theory, Critical social science, Critical race theory, Movement law, Grounded theory
First Advisor
Sonia Lawrence
Abstract
This thesis concerns an exploratory study about “social change” lawyers in Canada. Based on qualitative interviews, I aim to provide a modest but in-depth examination of the experiences and practical challenges these lawyers face in their work and how they navigate them. I find their approaches are divided between external and internal, both of which are affected by lawyers’ positionalities and experiences. “External approaches” concern how they reconcile conflicts in their values and responsibilities to different groups—namely individuals, communities and social movements—with each other, and with their obligations to the legal profession. Meanwhile, “internal approaches” concern how they navigate conflicting feelings arising out of working in contradictory and oppressive external systems. Ultimately, there is no formula or answer to how this work can be done; both approaches rely on finding a balance between conflicting parties or feelings and accepting an inherent uncertainty and unresolved nature of the work.
Recommended Citation
McKenzie, Marina Francesca, "(Un)Necessary Evils?: Ethical and Emotional Conflicts for Social Change Lawyers in Canada" (2024). LLM Theses. 76.
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/llm/76
Comments
Author owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.