A Nathanson Centre and Robina Institute joint international conference
Friday, 1 April – Sunday, 3 April, 2016
Location: Room 1014, Ignat Kaneff Building Osgoode Hall Law School York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
Background and Conference Theme
From 2008 to 2012, a number of leading criminal law theorists (Duff, Farmer, Marshall, Renzo, and Tadros) engaged in an ambitious project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council of the United Kingdom. The task they set for themselves was to try and answer the questions of what should be criminalized, according to what goals and principles, what forms this criminalization should take, and how it should be applied. The group organized a series of meetings and workshops on different aspects of this inquiry, involving a large number of criminal law scholars from across the globe. The project led to a number of notable publications, including four edited volumes: The Boundaries of Criminal Law (OUP 2010), The Structures of Criminal Law (OUP 2011), The Constitution of Criminal Law (OUP 2013), and Criminalization: The Political Morality of the Criminal Law (OUP 2014).
The introduction to the last volume sets out key areas of research that the conveners of the Project felt they were unable to tackle satisfactorily, given the inherent complexity of the issues at stake and the time-bounded character of their work. The most salient ones are:
- 1. Processes of criminalization: who apart from legislatures has/should have the power/authority to determine what is substantively criminalized? What about prosecutors and police? How different is the process at the international level?
- 2. The need to ground a normative account of criminalization – whether it focuses on substantive or procedural conditions for legitimate criminalization – in a political theory (which is clearly connected to (1)), and to understand criminal law as part of the political structure of the state. Connected to this is the question whether similar or different theories should be applied at the domestic and international levels.
- 3. The attractions/drawbacks of looking for a grand unitary theory of criminalization based on some single principle or value (harm; Rechtsgut; dignity; sovereignty; civil order…).
- 4. The relationship/division of labor between criminal law and other modes of regulation/other ways of responding to wrongs – including e.g. administrative regulatory regimes, tort law, restorative justice processes, etc.
The main aim of this conference is to continue to build on the work done in the context of the Criminalization Project to advance our understanding of these issues and other related ones.
To do so, we are bringing together a group of dynamic and original early and mid-career criminal law theorists, many of whom did not have a chance to participate in the Criminalization Project. It is our hope that their fresh perspectives will allow us to make further progress in unraveling the complexity of the issues outlined, and contribute to unveiling new vistas and questions from which to better understand the legitimate ambit of criminalization, domestically and/or internationally.
See attached file.
Click here for conference papers (Password protected)
"Conference: The Legitimate Ambit of Criminalization (April 2016)" (2016). Conferences and Workshops. 49.
chiao - criminal law in the age of the administrative state - draft.pdf (242 kB)
Paper 1: Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State
Criminalization and Welfare shorter.pdf (131 kB)
Paper 2: Criminalization and Welfare
Dempsey_Processes-of-Criminalization.pdf (324 kB)
Paper 3: Processes of Criminalization in Domestic and International Law
Murphy Criminal Law the Circumstances of Justice 1.0 03-22-16.pdf (253 kB)
Paper 4: Criminal Law and Circumstances of Justice
Paciocco_Bad-Man-Good-Prosecutor.pdf (553 kB)
Paper 5: The “Bad Man” and the Good Prosecutor
Paper. Picinali.pdf (250 kB)
Paper 6: Do theories of punishment necessarily deliver a binary system of verdicts
Paper_Osgoode 2016.pdf (184 kB)
Paper 7: The Legitimacy of International Courts and the Question of Community
POAMA_Osgoode Paper.pdf (235 kB)
Paper 8: The Legitimate Ambit of Domestic and International Criminalization
Punishing Pure Thought - Mendlow.pdf (169 kB)
Paper 9: Punishing Pure Thought
Standing - Canada.pdf (288 kB)
Paper 10: Standing in Criminal Law
1_26152738590_o.jpg (7639 kB)
Conference photo 1
02_26333240722_o.jpg (8950 kB)
Conference photo 2
2_26425589555_o.jpg (7988 kB)
Conference photo 3
03_26399624246_o.jpg (7719 kB)
Conference photo 4
04_25822785633_o.jpg (8377 kB)
Conference photo 5
05_26425589015_o.jpg (8361 kB)
Conference photo 6
5_26425588705_o.jpg (8498 kB)
Conference photo 7
06_26425588225_o.jpg (7628 kB)
Conference photo 8