Administrative Justice and Innovation: Beyond the Adversarial/Inquisitorial Dichotomy
The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectices. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2013.
administrative justice; administrative law; administrative proceeding; role of tribunal; tribunal
The purpose of this paper is to explore the various mechanisms and processes through which tribunals can assume a greater role in hearings than they have in the traditional adversarial process. As the papers in this collection by Robin Creyke and Robert Thomas illustrate, the idea that tribunals should be understood in terms of their similarity to (or deviation from) a court hearing, in which the judge is a neutral and passive arbiter, is giving way to a new paradigm in the Commonwealth in which an accessible administrative hearing featuring active adjudicators is a norm, not the exception. At the same time, any administrative proceeding which is not adversarial is too often simply lumped together as – inquisitorial.‖ An inquisitorial proceeding is generally one where the decision-maker engages in fact finding. We suggest most administrative proceedings may be located somewhere between the model of the courtroom and the model of the inquiry and that these hybrids and halfway houses merit more attention.
Sossin, Lorne, and Samantha Green. "Administrative Justice and Innovation: Beyond the Adversarial/Inquisitorial Dichotomy." The Nature of Inquistional Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectices. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2013.
This document is currently not available here.
Click here to access the catalogue record for this item.