Merely Political Or Meaningfully Religious? Indigenous Protest Rituals And Their Legal Afterlives
Merely Political or Meaningfully Religious? Indigenous Protest Rituals And Their Legal Afterlives Prof Greg Johnson, University of Colorado
Standing near the summit of Mauna Kea, two stone ahu (altars) are sites of contemporary Native Hawaiian religious vitality. The State of Hawaii, however, has a problem with the ahu. Specifically, they sit on the proposed site of a $1.4 billion dollar telescope project and were ritually constructed in the course of protest actions against the project in 2015. The State has deemed the altars “merely political” and therefore not deserving of consultative consideration or protection. Now, as part of their ongoing effort to protect the mountain, some Hawaiian petitioners are challenging the State in the Supreme Court, insisting that the altars are manifestations of a long-held tradition.
Johnson will address this dispute, including his role as a witness in it, asking: What can be learned from cases wherein modern conceptions of jurisdiction and static notions of religion conflict with place-based forms of religious expression, especially those that emerge in protest settings? Johnson will sketch several comparative examples of such impasses, including the role of prophecy at Standing Rock. His presentation will conclude with an invitation to the audience to think about implications of such cases for Canadian contexts.
Johnson, Greg, "Merely Political Or Meaningfully Religious? Indigenous Protest Rituals And Their Legal Afterlives" (2018). Osgoode Colloquium on Law, Religion & Social Thought. 13.